The documents collection houses a library of available PJM Interconnection materials. Because of the requirements for formatting or viewing the material on the website, the documents may not be exact reproductions of the originals.


Agreements: PJM forms agreements with stakeholders to ensure the reliability of the electric power grid.
Manuals: The PJM manuals are the administrative, planning, operating and accounting procedures of PJM Interconnection.
Maps: PJM offers maps of its service territory.


From: To:
Author Date Document
PJM 10.27.2014 Docket No. EL13-75-000 PDF
On October 27, 2014, in Docket No. EL13-75-000, certain indicated load serving entities, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (collectively, the “Settling Parties”) submitted a Settlement Agreement and Offer of Settlement (“Settlement Agreement”). The Settlement Agreement resolves all issues related to the refund MISO submitted to PJM for market-to-market operations conducted under the MISO-PJM JOA at issue in this proceeding.
PJM 10.27.2014 Docket No. ER06-78-000 PDF
On October 27, 2017, in Docket No. ER06-78-000, PJM submitted an informational filing to provide the 2015 annual budget of the Organization of PJM States, Inc. (“OPSI”) as required under Schedule 9-OPSI of PJM’s Tariff.
PJM 10.22.2014 Docket No. EL14-55-000 PDF
On October 22, 2014, PJM filed an answer to the Amended Complaint of FirstEnergy Service Company in Docket No. EL14-55-000. PJM’s answer requests that the Commission deny the complaint or, should the Commission decline to deny it, to defer any action on the complaint so long as the recently granted stay of the appellate decision in Electric Power Supply Association v. FERC, 753 F.3d 216 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (“EPSA”), remains in effect. To the extent the Commission elects to address the merits of the complaint, PJM asks the Commission to order additional procedures (1) to determine the legal merit of FirstEnergy’s claim that the EPSA decision precludes the participation of demand resources in RPM, PJM’s capacity market, and (2) in the event the Commission determines the complaint has legal merit, to identify and implement narrower and more equitable remedies than those proposed by FirstEnergy, consistent with the path forward outlined by PJM in a recent white paper filed by PJM in this docket on October 7, 2014. PJM’s answer explains that it anticipates, subject to certain conditions, submitting revisions to RPM, to be effective as a “stop-gap” approach for the Base Residual Auction of May 2015, in the event the EPSA litigation remains unresolved.
PJM 10.22.2014 Docket No. ER13-1864-000 PDF
On October 22, 2014, in Docket No. ER13-1864-000, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.(“PJM”) submitted post-technical conference reply comments in response to the initial post-technical conference comments submitted by Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.’s (“MISO”) Independent Market Monitor (“IMM”).
PJM 10.20.2014 Docket No. ER15-134-000 PDF
On October 20, 2014, in Docket No. ER15-134-000, PJM submitted revisions to Article 1 and Schedule 8 of the RAA to add a definition of Operating Day and to allow Electric Distributors to submit corrections to Obligation Peak Load data up to 12:00 PM the next business day following the Operating Day. PJM requests an effective date of January 1, 2015.
PJM 10.20.2014 Docket Nos. ER14-2864-000 and ER14-2867-000 PDF
On October 20, 2014, in Docket Nos. ER14-2864-000 and ER14-2867-000, PJM filed a motion for leave to answer and answer of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. to protests regarding PJM’s proposed revisions to Schedule 6 of the PJM Amended and Restated Operating Agreement to add new provisions allowing PJM to plan and include multiple driver projects in its regional transmission expansion plan.
PJM 10.20.2014 Docket No. ER15-135-000 PDF
On October 20, 2014, in Docket No. ER15-135-000, PJM submitted proposed revisions to Attachment DD of the Tariff to implement a transition provision for certain Demand Resources affected by recent changes to the Reliability Pricing Model notification requirements for the 2015/2016 Delivery Year and subsequent Delivery Years. The transition provision only applies to Demand Resources that (i) cannot satisfy the 30-minute notification requirement described in Section A.2 of Attachment DD-1 of the Tariff and the parallel provision of Schedule 6 of the RAA; (ii) are not excepted from the 30-minute notification requirement based on physical operational limitations; and (iii) cleared in the BRA or First Incremental Auction for the 2015/2016 Delivery Year or in the BRA for the 2016/2017 Delivery Year. PJM requests an effective date of December 19, 2014.
PJM 10.16.2014 Docket No. ER14-2740-001 PDF
On October 16, 2014, in Docket No. ER14-2740-001, PJM submitted a compliance filing informing the Commission of the proposed effective date for the credit requirements for Export Transactions. PJM is requesting an effective date of November 4, 2014.